I've posted the Rev. 11- October 26, 2012 ES6 draft at the usual place: 
http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=harmony:specification_drafts 

Here is the change summary for this draft:

Changes include:

Changes include:

        • Changed the name of the Program grammar production to Script. Updated 
the syntax, static and runtime semantics of Script in 14.1
        • In 10.1, defined the terms “module code” and “generator code”.
        • Specified semantics of global environment records and and global 
declaration instantiation semantics in line with the Sept. 2012 TC39 meeting 
decisions.
        • Specified WeakMap and Set
        • Added iterator functions and iterator objects for Array
        • Added Map clear method
        • Made Map size an accessor property
        • Updated function declaration instantiation semantics to reflect Sept. 
2012 TC39 discussion of function parameters. However, there are likely to be 
more changes following the next meeting.
        • Some refactoring of early errors associated with places that use 
cover grammars.
        • Work on semantics of var/function declarations at top levels of 
functions and scripts.
        • Updated early error rules for formal function parameters based upon 
recent es-discuss thread.
        • Chapter 15 functions now get poison pills for “arguments” and 
“caller”.
        • Changed Object.defineProperties to defer exceptions until all 
property updates are completed.
        • Stubbed in a place holder for Object.assign.
        • Made it explicit that Function.prototype does not have a prototype 
property.
        • Resolved bugs: 817-813, 812, 810, 805, 804-799, 796, 795, 792, 
790-787, 784, 783, 780-777, 761-757, 755-751, 748, 747, 745-735, 733, 732, 
726-716, 714, 712, 710, 706-700, 694, 690-683, 681-679, 674, 671-664, 658, 636, 
627, 626, 614, 591, 570, 504, 496-494, 414, 401, 357, 312, 265, 260, 247, 214, 
182, 153
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss

Reply via email to