+1 ... but funny that for Strings I would naturally use "mychunk" in
mystring rather than mystring.has("mychunk") .... I believe contains comes
from XSL, isn't it? Was it W3C suggestion or what?On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 10:20 AM, Erik Arvidsson <[email protected]>wrote: > On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 12:30 PM, Mark S. Miller <[email protected]> > wrote: > > I also support calling it "has" as Rick suggests. Perhaps this also helps > > suggest that it is like the other "has"s, which use SameValue, and not > like > > indexOf. > > > > (I am still sad we did not fix indexOf, lastIndexOf, and switch when we > > arguably had the chance.) > > If we call it "has", should we also rename String.prototype.contains? > > -- > erik > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
