Brandon Benvie wrote:
I understand that there's limitations on what can be packed into this
release and in particular this proposal pushes the limits. But I don't
buy the ES7-is-around-the-corner wager for two reasons.
Neither ES6 (+1 years) nor ES7 (+4) is "around the corner".
You are forgetting that we draft specs and *prototype-implement* well in
advance of dotting ISO i's and crossing Ecma t's. Same as for "HTML5"
and other modern standards.
So please do help get @-names back on track. Recall the main objection
was not the generativity of @names mixed with the obj.@foo pun
(after-dot). It was the usability tax of having to declare
private @foo;
before defining/assiging
obj.@foo = foo;
(in a constructor, typically).
/be
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
