On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 3:13 PM, Andrea Giammarchi < [email protected]> wrote:
> Said that, since as I have written "no pattern blocks anyone to reach > same goals inline" I don't even feel that strong about it, I am just saying > what would be the ideal scenario in my opinion, wondering initially why it > has been chosen a different one. > > I am happy to read that I wasn't the only one preferring the value instead > of `this` so ... mine was just a summary for CC'ed people and nothing else. > > All I would like to believe is that these discussions are performed more > often in this ML and before Meeting Notes so you have more material there > before making decisions. > This is at least the third time that you've implied that "the committee" made a decision without considering the facts. I chose to not respond previously, but I'm going to tell you right now that I reject your implication—on the grounds that you're wrong. I spent a lot of time preparing and researching patterns of "post mutation returns" in widely adopted codebases, as well as measuring developer expectations by way of informal survey. If I had any reason to believe that this was not a desirable approach, I would've requested removal from agenda myself. Prior to the meeting, I spoke in person with several different committee members to get a general feel and the support was unanimously in favor. Rick > >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
