Yeah I was using it in the Mozilla terminology way, not referring to the browser. =D
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 6:16 PM, Brendan Eich <[email protected]> wrote: > Brandon Benvie wrote: > >> The ability to break invariants of the language either requires an >> external object-capability provider to dole out permission to do this (such >> as what is currently done with "chrome" code >> > > Just to clarify for anyone following along (including me!), you must mean > Firefox or another XUL app's UI "chrome" including privileged JS, which > indeed is endowed with extra capabilities. Not Google Chrome -- right? > > /be > > being executed with access to privileged internals), or a mechanism in >> the language to dole out special permissions that goes beyond "first come, >> first serve". >> ______________________________**_________________ >> es-discuss mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://mail.mozilla.org/**listinfo/es-discuss<https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss> >> >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
