David Bruant wrote:
Le 19/12/2012 16:38, Claude Pache a écrit :
Le 19 déc. 2012 à 15:32, David Bruant <[email protected]> a écrit :

Le 19/12/2012 14:13, Claude Pache a écrit :
Hello,

In SpiderMonkey (and perhaps other JS engines?), there are conditional catch clauses:

    catch (exception if condition)

Could such a feature added to ECMAScript?

Rationale: Although try/catch mechanism was initially intended for treating errors, it could be used in normal control flow with non-error condition.
Why not just use normal control flow when you want to express non-error conditions? throw/try/catch was indeed intented for treating errors and when I read code, I expect an error path when encountering a try/catch.
As I've said, iterators throw StopIteration, which may be considered as a non-error.
I completely agree. I have said elsewhere [1] that StopIteration could be its own statement. What we want is a way to stop the current call frame. The language provides 2 such ways, return and throw. Return can't be used because it may result in ambiguities. It could be the same thing for throw, but normal use of throw make that throwing a specific object is an acceptable hack on StopIteration.

This is a red herring. It's very rare to have to catch StopIteration.

The catch (e if cond) syntax is in SpiderMonkey and Rhino, dates from ES3 where it was proposed, prototyped, and shot down in Ecma TC39 TG1, but kept in the implementations. Again, this syntax helps discriminate on e's duck type or instanceof without requiring a hand-coded if-else chain or switch, with mandatory re-throw in final-else or default.

In TC39 we had a discussion, I think in March 2011, about generalized refutable match as proposed by dherman:

http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=strawman:pattern_matching

This was considered not baked enough to put in ES6. The tension with destructuring is an ongoing issue in my view. Also, Dave's strawman changes catch from how it works in SpiderMonkey and Rhino, so a pattern implies an 'if'.

I think we need to talk about refutable patterns and matching again, before we beat the catch-if dead horse once again. Suggest new spin-off thread (different subject).

/be
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss

Reply via email to