That's great news! Thank you!
Nathan >> On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 4:57 PM, Nathan Wall >> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> I never fully understood why the arguments object couldn't be an array, >> and I know there is at least an attempted purge of the arguments object >> from the language with the addition of rest parameters.. But, for the >> transitional period, can the arguments object have an @@iterator >> property? Please?? > > Yes > > >> (I looked for it in the draft and didn't see it, but I might not have >> known where to look.) > > Likely because Allen had enough on his plate for this draft, but there > is already a ticket based on a resolution from the last TC39 > meetng: https://bugs.ecmascript.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1114 > > > Rick _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
