Nathan Wall wrote:
Brendan Eich:
No, not if the symbol is not in the whitelist. Zero information leak is
required.
That's good news too. Objection withdrawn.
Maybe I gave up too easy :). Is the `unknownPrivateSymbol` trap called? What's
the rationale for this trap?
I just wrote that the trap is not even called if the symbol is not in
the whitelist passed in when the proxy is created.
The rationale was given clearly by Tom Van Cutsem here:
http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=strawman:proxies_names
referenced by this post:
https://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/2012-September/025010.html
/be
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
