This isn't exactly a direct parallel because all the types that are included as part of ES6 will be proxyable in such a way that the proxy can be transparently interchanged with its target. The problem with DOM objects is that this isn't true. I think it would be a good practice for the providers of unproxyable platform APIs to be up front about their inability to be proxied successfully.
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 5:58 PM, David Bruant <[email protected]> wrote: > Le 12/01/2013 23:28, Andrea Giammarchi a écrit : > > I don't want to detect node and proxied node >> > Why would you have to? > Currently, before calling .appendChild, do you write code that detects > that you're not trying to append a normal object or a date or an array? I > have personally never done such a test, because anytime I .appendChild, > I've created the node before or picked it up from the DOM tree. Why would > it be different when proxies are out? > > David > > ______________________________**_________________ > es-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.mozilla.org/**listinfo/es-discuss<https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss> >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
