Hi David, you remember correctly. Thanks!
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 1:31 AM, David Bruant <[email protected]> wrote: > Le 11/03/2013 22:51, Andrea Giammarchi a écrit : > > the outer `with` statement ... you see my point? we are dropping powerful >> features in order to make JavaScript the toy we all think is since ever >> > A while ago I discussed the 'with' trick on es-discuss (I don't remember > when, it was a message about dynamic loaders IIRC) and I think Mark's reply > was that it was a "temporary" (ES5 era) hack and the proper ES6 way would > be to use a custom loader (using the a custom 'global' property). > In that instance, "with" isn't a powerful feature, it's a convenience used > so that the relevant sandboxing code is 6 lines instead of a full parser, > because if there was no "with", that's probably what Caja would be doing > anyway. > > David > > ______________________________**_________________ > es-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.mozilla.org/**listinfo/es-discuss<https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss> > -- Cheers, --MarkM
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
