On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 12:28 PM, Rick Waldron <waldron.r...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 12:23 PM, Domenic Denicola > <dome...@domenicdenicola.com> wrote: >> >> From: Rick Waldron [waldron.r...@gmail.com] >> >> > TC39 reached consensus on the inclusion of WeakSet, though it needs to >> > be designed: >> > >> > https://github.com/rwldrn/tc39-notes/blob/master/es6/2012-09/sept-19.md#weakset >> >> Is this ES6 timeframe, or ES7? I have run into a few use cases for it >> since hearing this, and was hoping it was on-track. > > > The discussion immediately preceding that discussion indicates that WeakSet > will be a requirement of Proxy: > > https://github.com/rwldrn/tc39-notes/blob/master/es6/2012-09/sept-19.md#proxy-and-private-names
Note that this requirement is conditional on a particular approach (which I still favor) to the interaction between proxies and private names, and so since that's still up in the air, the WeakSet requirement for ES6 may go away. Sam _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
