I said this in the other thread but I don't mind repeating myself. A better way forward is to provide these for iterators.
mySet.values().some(func) mySet.values().every(func) mySet.values().reduce(func) new Set(mySet.values().filter(func)) new Set(mySet.values().map(func)) I'm not opposed to adding these to Set and Map but I think it is more important to define these using iterators first since it scales better to new collection types. On Mar 30, 2013 8:06 AM, "Herby Vojčík" <he...@mailbox.sk> wrote: > > Definitely, +1. > > Also, add reduceRight as well, even if it would only do the same as reduce. > > Peter Michaux wrote: >> >> In another thread, I'm told there is currently no plans to add the >> following to Set.prototype. >> >> some >> every >> reduce >> filter >> map >> >> These seem like very natural additions and the type of operations that >> one would want to do on sets. >> >> Peter >> _______________________________________________ >> es-discuss mailing list >> es-discuss@mozilla.org >> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss > > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > es-discuss@mozilla.org > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
