Dmitry Lomov wrote:
If people agree this is generally a thing to be avoided, I am happy to collect a systematic list of these issues and suggest fixes - but maybe I am missing something and that has some deep motivation?
No, please collect and file at bugs.ecmascript.org -- these are indeed errors in the draft. We need to throw on negative length. We must *not* spec clamping negative indexes to 0 at runtime. Other deviations from Khronos and implementation need to be considered carefully in light of performance and safety (which are not always at odds).
Thanks to you and Domenic for flagging. /be _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
