Anne van Kesteren wrote:
Apologies for the ambiguity. I meant pushing for an "API idiomacy review" process.
Thanks -- on that front, recent API work (DAP, WebApps, SysApps) has been about par for the course, from what I've seen. In other words, a mixed bag ranging from nicely-idiomatic or good-enough, all the way to we're-sorry-and-we-will-do-better-next-time ;-). And since nothing has progressed beyond LC yet AFAIK, there may still be time to fix things.
But as I wrote privately, I don't think we can firehose all the new APIs through public-script-coord and get good API review results. We could go API by API in a more focused forum or meeting-like setting, with public-script-coord hosting the notices for upcoming reviews, progress updates, and review conclusions. Thoughts?
/be _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
