Trimming cc: list to just es-discuss.
Mark S. Miller wrote:
* Completing the class design
- at least high integrity and private state
If I'm not mistaken, we need class-private syntax for classes to have
ultimate double-blind consensus in *ES6*. See last meeting notes.
At JQueryUK, I threw up a sketch in slides based on
http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=strawman:relationships:
|class SkinnedMeshextends THREE.Mesh{
private identityMatrix,
bones,
boneMatrices;
constructor(geometry, materials) {
super(geometry, materials);
this@identityMatrix= new THREE.Matrix4();
this@bones= [];
this@boneMatrices= [];
...
}
...
}|
The TypeScript (CoffeeScript had it already, and more concisely via @)
option to declare and initialize via a private prefix on one of
constructor's parameters would be helpful to many developers:
|class Point{
constructor(private x, private y) {}
add(other) {
return Point(this@x + other@x, this@y + other@y);
}
...
}
|
I hope we can agree to do this much for ES6, based on the relationships
work, which I'd like to thank Tom and you for championing. At first I
thought it was not helpful, but then the lightbulb went off ;-).
/be
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
