Then consider `Object.freeze(console)`. Fundamentally, frozen objects are not appropriate for prohibiting shared state.
Sam On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 6:44 PM, Kevin Gadd <[email protected]> wrote: > isn't typeof (console.log) "function" and not "object"? by object I meant an > Object object, not 'any arbitrary JS value'. I suppose the distinction is > really blurry, and you would still have to deal with problems like the > object's prototype chain containing callables... > > > On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 3:42 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 6:33 PM, Kevin Gadd <[email protected]> wrote: >> > if I called Object.freeze or Object.seal on a JS object would it >> > actually be >> > safe to pass it to another thread and let both threads use it without >> > any >> > locking or guards? >> >> No, it's not safe. Consider Object.freeze(console.log). >> >> Sam > > > > > -- > -kg _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
