On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 1:37 PM, David Bruant <[email protected]> wrote: > I personally wonder whether the compatibility with existing libraries is so > important. It should be pretty easy to wrap a native future into a library > future (aren't native futures already Promise/A+ compatible?) and vice > versa. Why isn't it enough to help with compatibility with libraries?
They are compatible because of how futures make use of then. -- http://annevankesteren.nl/ _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
