Sam, I hope that will be the case, that's why I mentioned that I've only been following es-discuss for a short amount of time. I wasn't sure about the speed of response to such a substantial argument. I waited a day to see if anyone was interested or if it generated a discussion.
I agree that interoperability with older module systems is desirable and that it should not come at the cost of a better standard ES6 module system. B. On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 2:46 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Apr 25, 2013 4:00 AM, "Brian Di Palma" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I've been following es-discuss for a short amount of time. >> I'm a JS dev working on a significant code base, this biases how I >> perceive ES6 issues. >> >> From my viewpoint by far the most important advancements provided by >> ES6, eclipsing all others, >> are modules and classes. This feeling is widely shared among the >> developers I work with. >> >> So I'm somewhat surprised at the lack of response to Andreas email. > > On this point, Andreas wrote a long email, which I'm sure he spent time on. > A response deserves similar consideration. I'm sure you'll see some soon. > > Sam _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
