From: Juan Ignacio Dopazo [[email protected]] > 2013/4/26 Kevin Smith <[email protected]> >>>> Oops yeah. I guess that should be fixed. :/ >>>> >>> Fixing that would break compatibility with Promises/A+. To remain >>> compatible with A+ and unwrap only one layer, the spec would need a way to >>> discern promises from thenables. >>> >> I don't think so. It has no bearing on Promises/A+, because A+ doesn't test >> the case where the promise's value is itself a promise.
> Yes, sorry. It will on version 1.1: > https://github.com/promises-aplus/promises-spec/#the-promise-resolution-procedure To clarify: in 1.0, the behavior of returning a thenable was highly underspecified, in part because of a lack of clarity about promises vs. thenables. In 1.1, returning a thenable is now specified in the same detail as the rest of the spec, and (of course) has accompanying tests. _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
