On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 7:17 PM, David Herman <[email protected]> wrote: > On Apr 26, 2013, at 7:27 AM, Kevin Smith <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I'm not understanding how this strategy will facilitate namespace > > coordination. I can > > only see it leading to namespace confusion. > > There is, of course, a need for people to agree on common naming for shared > modules. One additional point on this topic. Even on the web, where there isn't something like NPM as an arbiter for names, the JS community has managed to use shared resources like the global object and the AMD module name space effectively. And as Dave points out, building tools like NPM for web JavaScript will improve upon this further. We shouldn't bake in a harder-to-use system up front when JS is doing well as it is. Sam _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
