On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 7:10 PM, Brendan Eich <[email protected]> wrote: > Anne van Kesteren wrote: >> So now you have two conventions... > > If the newer one is better, that's progress. Building on a broken > ("annoyingly") convention to keep some unity-of-conventions ideal at the > expense of usability is not the obvious winner. > > With the Web, you never can hope to have "one way to do it". The goal is > "better over time".
I meant doing something different for worker scripts and document scripts. Document scripts would all share a base URL whereas worker scripts would each have their own. CSS @import also behaves different from JavaScript import then. That URLs set at runtime have a different base URLs seems kinda logical as there's no obvious way to relate them to the script, but for static URLs it feels wrong. (As does the appending ".js" and such. Too much magic.) -- http://annevankesteren.nl/ _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
