Erik Arvidsson wrote:
Two names seems like a bad compromise. We should either do
`next(...args)` or `resume(...args)`. Not both.
Right, and 'resume' makes no sense for iterators.
C'mon you two whose names start with A: this bikeshedding is wasteful
and disharmonious. We have much bigger fish to fry. Now is not the time
to be messing around. That is all :-|.
/be
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Andreas Rossberg
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
On 14 May 2013 17:07, Allen Wirfs-Brock <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
> What about providing a convenience "resume" method on generators
to help clarify co-routine style usage? Dave suggested that
"resume" was pedagogically useful.
>
> I would define it equivalently two:
>
> resume(...args) {return this.next(...args};
>
> (resume rather than next delegates to avoid the delegation for
normal for-of iterations)
Not sure about having two names for the same method, but if so, why
not simply make Generator.prototype.resume ===
Generator.prototype.next?
/Andreas
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
--
erik
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
