On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 2:11 PM, Dmitry Soshnikov <
[email protected]> wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
>
And sorry for auto greeting mailing-template if it hurts someone ;)
> Sorry for the random question (probably it was already discussed).
>
> What is a current state having mixins/traits syntax along with a class
> definition?
>
> Like:
>
> class Foo extends Bar {
> use EventEmitter, CommonMethodsMixin;
> ...
> }
>
> where mixins provided in "use" declarations are simple objects which are
> copied to the Foo.prototype. (with potential optimization of delegating to
> mixins).
>
> We currently use an extension in our pre-processing infrastructure, which
> does exactly what described above (so it's not that hard to have it as a
> sugar in local projects):
>
> class Foo extend Bar mixin(EventEmitter) { ... }, although "use" seems
> fits better and to have it on standard level is seems reasonable.
>
> Thanks,
> Dmitry
>
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
