On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 3:09 AM, Anne van Kesteren <ann...@annevk.nl> wrote:
> On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt <sa...@ccs.neu.edu>
> wrote:
>> No, you don't need to do anything differently. Conceptually, there
>> are three things you need:
>>
>> 1. When the Map is created, before it's handed to the program, some
>> items are added.
>> 2. Some platform operations also change this map in addition to doing
>> the other things they do.
>> 3. Some other set of platform operations consult this map when doing
>> their other work.
>>
>> Obviously, this is the spec perspective; an implementation could have
>> some magic version of the Map that does the update of the internal
>> platform state eagerly when map.set() is called.
>
> How does that ensure that e.g.
>
> map.set("var-" + somethingNotAllowedByCSS, "test")
>
> throws / is ignored (forgot what the desired semantic is)? Or
>
> map.set("var-test", {toString:function(){return"test")})
> map.get("var-test")
>
> returns "test"?
If the plan is to do that, then you should _not_ use Map. That isn't a Map.
But why do you want to do this? Why not just have the CSS side ignore
properties with bad names/values?
Sam
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
