On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 11:53 AM, Jason Orendorff <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 12:02 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <[email protected]> > wrote: >> On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Jason Orendorff >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Counterproposal: address this in WebIDL. Add a magic [Maplike] tag that >> > means something like: [...] >> >> [...] It's not the *best* solution, because the easy magic is only there >> for >> >> spec authors, but it's the best so far. > > > I see your point. I think this is a case where spec authors definitely have > a problem, but JS programmers will not sweat it that much. > > In JS it's just so easy: https://gist.github.com/jorendorff/5645591
That's only "easy" because we can assume that authors will manually adjust their code when we add more Map methods, or if they want to add their *own* Map methods. That's the exact thing I'm complaining about, except that we can't assume that specs will get updated in this way. ~TJ _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
