On Fri 14 Jun 2013 04:24, Luke Hoban <[email protected]> writes:

> (I believe this introduces the only place that "var x" is allowed but
> cannot have an initializer?).

FWIW, there are similar situations in the same spot of the grammar: "let
x" can't have an initializer in for-of or for-in, and neither can "var
x" in for-of.

Regards,

Andy
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss

Reply via email to