On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 2:06 PM, Rick Waldron <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 1:42 PM, Andrew Fedoniouk > <[email protected]> wrote: >> ... >> >> This construction >> >> foo {}; >> >> is an equivalent of: >> >> foo({}); >> >> but not >> >> foo(); > > > > Right, I get that... but what I'm telling you is that your proposal doesn't > work: > > foo {} > > Same as > > foo({}) > > > So, that means: > > foo > {} > > should be the same as > > foo > ({}) > > ...Because this is a valid function call. > > But it's not the same and cannot be defined as the same, because ASI put a > semi colon at the end of |foo| and {} is a valid empty block. Changing this > would surely be web breaking. >
Seems like I am not getting that famous ASI thing. I do not understand why here: foo (exp); there is no semicolon injected. It rather should be this: foo; (exp); if that ASI thing has any traces of logic behind. BTW: what about "use strict" ? Does it govern ASI parsing rules? If not then why? _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
