you might want to double check `Object.getPrototypeOf(generic)` does the same as `Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptor(Object.prototype, '__proto__').get.call(generic)`.
Apologies if this is already the case. off topic: any idea when `Object.setPrototypeOf(generic, proto)` will be rolled out and __proto__ not poisoned anymore ? br On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 7:01 PM, Allen Wirfs-Brock <[email protected]>wrote: > > On Jul 16, 2013, at 6:33 PM, Luke Hoban wrote: > > All current engines I could try return Number.prototype for:**** > ** ** > 12[“__proto__”]**** > ** ** > But the new spec says this should be a TypeError.**** > ** ** > It’s more consistent with the other members of Object.prototype to do an > implicit ToObject here, and apparently matches existing implementations. > Is it intentional that the spec is treating this as a TypeError?**** > ** ** > > > Well, it was intentional, but perhaps wrong. As you say, the set accessor > probably needs to do a ToObject. The set accessor probably only needs to > do a CheckObjectCoercible followed by an immediate return if the type of > this is not Object (the wrapper and hence it's modified [[Prototype]] isn't > observable, so it doesn't actually need to be created). > > File a bug, and I'll put the revised algorithms into the ticket. > > Allen > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss > >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
