First, I think we should question adding plain-named methods to
long-standard prototypes.
Second, we should avoid cybercruddy names.
Third, we should be careful to break common pairings such as key and value.
Where does this leave us? I'm thinking close to wanting a functional
API, generic keys, values, entries (nee items), with any method
delegation using symbol-named @keys, @values, @entries.
/be
Brandon Benvie wrote:
On 7/23/2013 9:00 AM, Till Schneidereit wrote:
Given that, I don't see how we can expect to be able to land
Array.prototype.values in any meaningful timeframe and think dropping
it or changing the name should be considered.
Bikeshed time! I submit "vals" and "items".
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
