I'm with Jeff. YAGNI, YouWillHateIt,
ItWillMakeYourEyesBleedWhenYouLeastExpectIt. Remember homomorphic URL
phishing attacks?
/be
Erik Arvidsson wrote:
It was decided to allow it for consistency with 0XFF and 0B11 and
leave this up to style guides and linters.
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 12:04 PM, Jeff Walden<[email protected]> wrote:
var n = 0O755;
Is this something anyone wants to read? I certainly don't! Allowing only
lowercase 'o' in octal literal syntax is inconsistent with 'x' and 'b', but on
balance I think that's probably preferable to admitting this monstrosity. :-)
(Which isn't to say I care strongly enough to spend a whole bunch of time
arguing the point, only enough to raise it as a concern and see if others
agree.)
Jeff
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss