I'm with Jeff. YAGNI, YouWillHateIt, ItWillMakeYourEyesBleedWhenYouLeastExpectIt. Remember homomorphic URL phishing attacks?

/be

Erik Arvidsson wrote:
It was decided to allow it for consistency with 0XFF and 0B11 and
leave this up to style guides and linters.

On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 12:04 PM, Jeff Walden<[email protected]>  wrote:
var n = 0O755;

Is this something anyone wants to read?  I certainly don't!  Allowing only 
lowercase 'o' in octal literal syntax is inconsistent with 'x' and 'b', but on 
balance I think that's probably preferable to admitting this monstrosity.  :-)  
(Which isn't to say I care strongly enough to spend a whole bunch of time 
arguing the point, only enough to raise it as a concern and see if others 
agree.)

Jeff
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss



_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss

Reply via email to