On Jul 26, 2013, at 8:50 AM, Domenic Denicola <[email protected]>
wrote:
> Why do arrow functions require a parameter list and a body? That is, none of
> the following are allowed:
>
> - `=> foo`
I guess this could be lexically unambiguous, but i'm unconvinced that the "win"
of losing two characters in the strictly less common no parameters is worth the
syntactic confusion
> - `bar =>`
> - `=>`
I think an optional tail would be a huge coding hazard - a typo could result in
bizarre behaviour, take:
blah(=>,5)
vs
blah(=>5)
>
> Instead you need the more-verbose
>
> - `() => foo`
Honestly I'm not sold on the {} free production, but i understand the arguments
for it. Randomly (and because i'm too lazy to check) how would
a => b => c
produce? I mean aside from making the maintainers cry.
--Oliver
> - `bar => {}`
> - `() => {}`
>
> Any chance of relaxing this a bit?
> _______________________________________________
> es-discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
