+1
My perspective: I don’t see a use case for a missing body, but a missing
parameter list would be very useful – to delay the execution of a block of
code. It also makes much sense visually:
2. (x, y) => { ... }
1. x => { ... }
0. => { ... }
On Jul 26, 2013, at 22:11 , Brandon Benvie <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 7/26/2013 11:53 AM, Michael Haufe wrote:
>> A useless parameter is an option:
>>
>> _=> 'foo'
>>
>
> This seems to be an argument in favor of making the params completely
> optional. The fact that throwing in a useless param is more concise than
> having zero params (due to paranthesis requirement).
>
> I think the semicolon hazard is enough to make omitting the body
> questionable, but omitting the params is an easy win with no downside.
> _______________________________________________
> es-discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
>
--
Dr. Axel Rauschmayer
[email protected]
home: rauschma.de
twitter: twitter.com/rauschma
blog: 2ality.com
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
