From: Allen Wirfs-Brock [[email protected]] > Why is setTypeOf attached to Function? There would seem to be very little to > naturally associate it with Function. I suppose it's because that's where > you put 'defineOperator'. Even there, the association with Function seems > tenuous. I actually find a stronger association with Math. But really, why > aren't these just functions export from the reflection module or some other > standard module?
+1, I was wondering the same. Just put these as functions in a module; they are not methods of `Function`. In particular, I assume they don't do `new this()` anywhere like the array statics do. _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
