You say either and I say either,
You say neither and I say neither
Either, either neither, neither
Let's call the whole thing off.
You like potato and I like potahto
You like tomato and I like tomahto
Potato, potahto, tomato, tomahto.
Let's call the whole thing off
- Ira Gershwin
----
I feel like calling off symbols when we have string-keyed interning
tables and three namespaces and bears, oh my.
/be
Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 11:34 AM, Dean Landolt<[email protected]> wrote:
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 1:57 PM, Tab Atkins Jr.<[email protected]>
wrote:
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 10:56 AM, Brendan Eich<[email protected]>
wrote:
Domenic Denicola wrote:
org.ecmascript.es6.builtins.iterator?
You forgot the smiley, or: nooooooooooo!!!!!!
Which is why I (not in jest) suggested the third property namespace,
for language-defined symbols. ^_^
Why a third namespace when there's the built-in modules that functions
nicely as our registry?
This suggestion was in the context of "symbol strings", which are just
strings in a separate namespace, rather than the existing concept of
symbols as a unique, empty, frozen object. With a symbol string,
where you retrieve it from doesn't matter - equality is still based on
the contents. If you want guaranteed non-conflict with user-space
symbols, you need a third namespace.
~TJ
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss