Let's take this off-list. Bikeshed territory. Dave
On Aug 21, 2013, at 12:26 PM, Dmitry Lomov <[email protected]> wrote: > Hmm really? I am not sure - how this reconciles with existing Object and > String? > Even if this is imported from a module, the clashing will be unfortunate. > > Dmitry > > > On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 9:02 PM, David Herman <[email protected]> wrote: > Any, String and Object should still be uppercase. The naming convention is: > value types lowercase, reference types uppercase. > > Dave > > On Aug 21, 2013, at 4:21 AM, Dmitry Lomov <[email protected]> wrote: > > > string, boolean, object and any are all lowercase (we should fix the wiki) > > > > FWIW, I am already working on a new version of polyfill. It is fully ES5. > > Here is a pull request: https://github.com/dherman/structs.js/pull/12 - > > I'll merge it soon, and work more to cover everything in the proposal. > > > > Thanks, > > Dmitry > > > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 3:21 AM, Andrea Giammarchi > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > sorry, point 3 was actually the question about point 2 > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 6:20 PM, Andrea Giammarchi > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Uhm, just a couple of extra question about that page if/when you have time: > > • string and boolean are mentioned, but nowhere in your `struct.js` > > prolyfill code. Will string and boolean be accepted? > > • `Object` and `Any` are mentioned, but exported as object and any in > > your `struct.js` prolyfill example. W > > • Which is the right way? > > The reason I am asking is to be able to create code that does absolutely > > nothing (for performance reason) but will look like the real thing so I can > > start experimenting with static structures and possibly a develop VS > > production version of an ES3 to ES5 compatible polyfill since I believe > > your code won't run anywhere except in SpiderMonkey (which is OK but it's > > not suitable for a lightweight migration to "structure like" logic) > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Andrea Giammarchi > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Awesome, thanks! > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 4:12 PM, David Herman <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Aug 20, 2013, at 1:31 PM, Andrea Giammarchi > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > [In this > > > page](http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=harmony:typed_objects), and > > > in the latest meeting note too, I can read both uint8 and Uint8, as > > > example. > > > > Bug. Fixed, thanks. > > > > > **The Question** > > > How is `new StructType({x:Uint32, y:Uint32})` supposes to understand the > > > type? `instanceof Uint32` or `typeof v === "uint32"` or ... both in case > > > of `boolean` and `string` ? > > > > Neither. It tells you that the x and y fields have typeof 'number' and that > > their values are constrained to be integers in the range [0, 2^32). > > > > > A bonus question would be: does anybody know when this stuff is planned > > > to go out? Not a single beta/alpha channel is exposing anything at all so > > > far. > > > > Nikhil Marathe and Niko Matsakis are actively working on the implementation > > for SpiderMonkey: > > > > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=578700 > > > > Dmitriy Lomov is actively working on updating the prollyfill to match the > > current API: > > > > https://github.com/dherman/structs.js > > https://github.com/dherman/structs.js/pull/12 > > > > Not sure if anyone on the V8 team (which includes Dmitriy) has started > > implementation but I believe they're interested. Right now Dmitriy is > > focused on the prollyfill and spec. > > > > Dave > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > es-discuss mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss > > > > > > _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
