So the defacto response for large scale JS development will always be: Use X?
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 12:35 PM, Jeremy Martin <[email protected]> wrote: > I haven't personally used it, but you may find that TypeScript provides > what you're looking for: http://www.typescriptlang.org/ > > > On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 1:26 PM, J B <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Is there any particular reason my JS doesn't support (optional) AS3 style >> strong typing? All the typing info would be ignored at run-time, but it >> would be helpful for compile-time checking, code hinting, and general >> readability of code. Tools like the closure compiler could even strip out >> all the typing info, and it wouldn't make any difference at run-time. I'm >> probably beating a dead horse here, but why? >> >> _______________________________________________ >> es-discuss mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss >> >> > > > -- > Jeremy Martin > 661.312.3853 > http://devsmash.com > @jmar777 >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
