https://brendaneich.com/2007/11/my-media-ajax-keynote/ I liked reading this...
https://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/2008-August/006837.html This is depressing. On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 2:50 PM, J B <[email protected]> wrote: > @Brendan "Those are warnings, but WarnScript was a bad name" --you mean > the tools (IDEs, closure compiler, etc) throw warnings, but not the Chrome > debugger, for instance, right? > > > On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Brendan Eich <[email protected]> wrote: > >> J B wrote: >> >>> @Brendan - The typing wouldn't be used at all during run-time. So, >>> unlike AS3, it wouldn't check if types were valid, and it wouldn't try an >>> kind of implicit coercion. >>> >>> >> Ok, that's not "typing" (I mean not a type system). >> >> "Those are warnings, but WarnScript was a bad name" - me at JSConf.au >> last November. >> >> The unsoundness means you have something that needs strong tool support, >> not just an error or JS console in which to spew. TypeScript got this right. >> >> This again puts unsound warning "types" outside of the standards track >> for a while. But carry on with TypeScript etc. -- TC39 is tracking. >> >> /be >> > >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
