Existing types with magic index properties (other than Array) just drop numeric 
expandos on the floor so it's logically a no-op.  Unless there was a numeric 
accessor on the prototype (which non-extensibility does not save you from).

My complaint is that this appears to be removing functionality that has been 
present in the majority of shipping TA implementations, assuming from LH's 
comment that Chakra supports expandos.

--Oliver

On Aug 27, 2013, at 9:26 AM, Domenic Denicola <[email protected]> 
wrote:

> I am not aware of all the nuances of the discussion, but as a developer I 
> would find the behavior for numeric expandos confusing. For a typed array of 
> length 1024, setting `ta[1023]` would do something completely different from 
> setting `ta[1024]`. Unlike normal arrays, setting `ta[1024]` would not change 
> `ta.length`, and presumably `ta[1024]` would not be exposed by the various 
> iteration facilities.
> 
> I would much rather received a loud error (in strict mode), which will either 
> alert me to my code being weird, or possibly to my code committing an 
> off-by-one error.

_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss

Reply via email to