On Aug 28, 2013, at 17:02 , Forbes Lindesay <[email protected]> wrote:
> It would be nice from a readability point of view if `iteratable.toArray()` > could always be used as a substitute for `Array.from(iteratable)`. Is there > a way that could be neatly achieved? For me, [ ... iterable ] would be good enough. Relatively readable and concise. > It would also be nice if methods like `.map` and `.filter` existed on > iteratables. C# does this via the concept of extension methods, but I wonder > whether something similar could be achieved here, at least in the case of > built in iteratables? It would be lovely to have a module with tool functions for this, similar to Python’s itertools. http://docs.python.org/3/library/itertools.html -- Dr. Axel Rauschmayer [email protected] home: rauschma.de twitter: twitter.com/rauschma blog: 2ality.com
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
