Allen, are you doing this some other way? Static semantics can't do it, we need parametric productions or else ye olde NoIn splitting.

/be
André Bargull <mailto:andre.barg...@udo.edu>
August 31, 2013 4:21 AM
The NoIn grammar productions have been removed in rev17. Does this mean that `for (a in b;;);` is now a valid (C-style) for-loop instead of a SyntaxError?


Thanks,
André
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss

Reply via email to