What does "f's handler" refer to? If obj is a proxy and f is not, then obj has a proxy and f does not.
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 6:32 PM, Allen Wirfs-Brock <[email protected]>wrote: > > On Sep 23, 2013, at 6:14 PM, Kevin Smith wrote: > > > Hi Allen, > > > > Your line of thinking has convinced me that `invoke` as it currently > stands doesn't really fly. However, I have an issue with your proposal. > Take this fragment: > > > > (1) function f() { doSomethingWith(this); } > > (2) f.call(obj); > > > > Presently, the expression at (2) grants the function `f` access to > `obj`. If I understand correctly, under your proposal the expression at > (2), in the case where `obj` is a proxy, additionally grants `obj` access > to `f`. Is that right? > > In the case where obj is a Proxy f.call(obj) would give f's handler access > to f. > > Allen > > > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss > -- Cheers, --MarkM
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
