Thanks. And do "we" know which one is the most common case or any reason we won't have the same in ES6 ? I see both options as a win. Having only the => version looks like a huge limit in arrow potential.
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 2:18 PM, Brendan Eich <[email protected]> wrote: > Your reply incoherently flattens some of my words with leading '> ' > citation prefixes. But I'll be brief here, no need to reply: > > > Andrea Giammarchi wrote: > >> In CoffeeScript the fat arrow behaves differently having a dynamic this, >> am I correct? >> > > No, you are incorrect. CoffeeScript's => binds this, its -> leaves this > unbound. > > /be >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
