I was talking about concrete and usable implementation of those specs. Updates and contribution always welcome, of course.
On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 11:18 AM, Allen Wirfs-Brock <[email protected]>wrote: > No, the closest yo a spec that we have is the spec > > http://people.mozilla.org/~jorendorff/es6-draft.html#sec-object.mixin > > Andrea Giammarchi <[email protected]> wrote: > > this is the closest to specs we have today: > https://github.com/WebReflection/object-mixin#object-mixin > > it does copy all own descriptors so it's suitable for almost everything > you need but `Symbols` (in any case absent in ES5) > > That being said, it will be compatible with my `Symbol` > proposal/shim/polyfill if used. > https://gist.github.com/gitawego/5831179 > > But I am not testing, neither suggesting, to use the latter one if not > truly needed and not through `Object.mixin` > > > br > > > On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 6:29 AM, medikoo > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> > It's a copy-paste error in the draft: >> > https://bugs.ecmascript.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1999#c1 >> >> Great news. Thanks! >> >> Sorry for noise. >> >> /Mariusz >> >> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://mozilla.6506.n7.nabble.com/Object-mixin-why-just-for-enumerables-tp293611p293623.html >> Sent from the Mozilla - ECMAScript 4 discussion mailing list archive at >> Nabble.com. >> _______________________________________________ >> es-discuss mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss >> > >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
