On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 10:15 AM, Rick Waldron <waldron.r...@gmail.com>wrote:
> # Nov 20 Meeting Notes
>
>
>
> #### Consensus/Resolution
>
> - Remove Object.mixin
> - "toMethod()" wins -- debate about argument order
>
>
>
> Function.prototype.toMethod(home[, mname])
>
>
>
A small observation: the toMethod is cool, and Allen recently showed an
example of how it can be applied:
```
(function(){super()})() //throws because unbound super
(function(){super()}).toMethod(Array.prototype,"toString").call([])///ok
```
The only thing I'm worried (and that Mark mentioned), is that the
super-inheritance is tightly related to the class-based sugar. While the
approach above again exposes the prototypes implementation detail via this
`.prototype` stuff.
Probably should be two:
```
.toMethod(Array, 'toString'); // to (instance/proto) method
.toStaticMethod(Array, 'toString'); // constructor's method
``
The former, as mentioned, works with the `.prototype` not exposing this
detail to the user-level code.
Dmitry
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
