> > Hold on there. If they already do assimilation, why would you even > inherit?
So that the system will see jQuery's assimilating promises as real promises. > So you're saying that promise library authors should rearchitect their > entire libraries, and that solution is better than them just adding a flag > to their prototype which says "convertableToPromise = true;" ? Which can be > monkey patched by end users too? I think you are probably overstating the burden on library authors in order to make your proposal look better. : ) Anyway, there's no point arguing about it. I just thought it would be fun to see what a good solution that prioritizes the future would look like. I think I've convinced myself that the backward compatibility constraint has been overestimated (probably because those working in the space also author promise libraries). But like I said: no point in arguing over it.
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
