Claude Pache wrote:
I agree that `constructor(...args){ return super(...args); }` is better (i.e.
less surprising) when the super-class's constructor returns an other object
than `this`. However, under the current state of the specification, there is at
least one exception: the `Object` constructor ignores its `this` value and
creates a fresh object, which is unwanted in the theoretical case you define a
class extending explicitly `Object`. I guess that this case could be normalised
by using a similar mechanism as `Array` and its [[ArrayInitialisationState]]
internal slot?
I thought Allen designed things so
class C {}
differed from
class C extends Object {}
so as in the first case to avoid (a) super calling Object and making a
useless newborn; (b) C inheriting class-side properties from Object.
/be
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
