On Jan 10, 2014, at 2:40 PM, Axel Rauschmayer wrote:
>
> ### I’m looking for a simple explanation of what enumerability will be, going
> forward. If there isn’t one then I’d argue that no new feature should be
> influenced by it.
That was one of the argument made in favor of concise methods defaulting as not
enumerable: enumerable really only controls whether a property shows up in
for-in (and a couple closely related reflection functions) and for-in has been
essentially deprecated and replace by for-of. That makes the enumerable
attribute an obsolete feature and we should be trying to give it meaning for
new features. Hence, just always default it to true.
Allen
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
