On Jan 15, 2014, at 11:18 AM, Jason Orendorff wrote: > ES6 adds a clz function, but it's a method of Number.prototype.clz > rather than Math.clz. > > The rationale for this decision is here (search for clz in the page): > http://esdiscuss.org/notes/2013-07-25 > > Can we reverse this, for users' sake? The pattern in ES1-5 is quite > strong: math functions go on the Math object. > > The rationale (What if we add a uint64 type?) doesn't seem compelling > enough to justify the weirdness of the result: we'll have a single > mathematical operation available only as a Number method, and all > others available only as Math functions.
So we discussed all that when we made that decision. I understand that you disagree but is there any new data that should cause us to reopen an issue that was already discussed and decided at a TC39 meeting? Allen _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
