David Sheets wrote:
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 11:26 PM, Brendan Eich<[email protected]> wrote:
> David Sheets wrote:
>>>
>>> . Old browsers ignore the new attribute will process the content, which
>>> > could be written to work "both ways".
>>
>>
>> Is a new attribute necessary? What about using @type?
>
>
> Old browsers will ignore unknown types, losing the two-way fallback option.
While it is possible to write scripts that change interpretation based
on out-of-band metadata,
There is no out-of-band metadata in a new script attribute. Attributes
are data, not data-about-data, and in-band in HTML.
is it desirable to encourage? Is it worth
creating a new attribute on the script element for what should be a
parameter of the media type?
Who says modules *should* be a media type parameter?
Is there a reason that feature detection and a new media type or media
type parameter would not suffice?
I'm advocating feature detection based on a new attribute, not a new
media type. I thought you were advocating the reverse.
/be
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
