> > > My take is that the difference between "cast" and "resolve" is so > subtle that I don't think it captures developer intention. In > other words, if I see some code calling Promise.cast(otherPromise), > I can't be sure that the developer made an intentional choice over > Promise.resolve(otherPromise). >
Note that `Promise.resolve(p)`, where p is a promise, does *not* return an eventual for the eventual value of p. Rather, it returns an eventual for p, literally. Promises should be considered fully parametric (in other words, nestable). If you want to convert a maybe-promise into a promise, then you want `cast`.
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss